We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
True prevalence of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study.
- Authors
Hastie, Claire E.; Lowe, David J.; McAuley, Andrew; Mills, Nicholas L.; Winter, Andrew J.; Black, Corri; Scott, Janet T.; O’Donnell, Catherine A.; Blane, David N.; Browne, Susan; Ibbotson, Tracy R.; Pell, Jill P.
- Abstract
Long-COVID prevalence estimates vary widely and should take account of symptoms that would have occurred anyway. Here we determine the prevalence of symptoms attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, taking account of background rates and confounding, in a nationwide population cohort study of 198,096 Scottish adults. 98,666 (49.8%) had symptomatic laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 99,430 (50.2%) were age-, sex-, and socioeconomically-matched and never-infected. While 41,775 (64.5%) reported at least one symptom 6 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection, this was also true of 34,600 (50.8%) of those never-infected. The crude prevalence of one or more symptom attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection was 13.8% (13.2%,14.3%), 12.8% (11.9%,13.6%), and 16.3% (14.4%,18.2%) at 6, 12, and 18 months respectively. Following adjustment for potential confounders, these figures were 6.6% (6.3%, 6.9%), 6.5% (6.0%, 6.9%) and 10.4% (9.1%, 11.6%) respectively. Long-COVID is characterised by a wide range of symptoms that, apart from altered taste and smell, are non-specific. Care should be taken in attributing symptoms to previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.Determining the prevalence of Long COVID is challenging because many symptoms attributed to the syndrome could have other causes. Here, the authors estimate the prevalence of Long COVID in Scotland by comparing rates of symptoms reported by people with and without history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- Publication
Nature Communications, 2023, p1
- ISSN
2041-1723
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1038/s41467-023-43661-w