We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The End of Jacobson's Spread: Five Arguments Why An Anti-Intoxicant Vaccine Would Be Unconstitutional.
- Authors
Russoniello, Kellen
- Abstract
The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Jacobson v. Massachusetts on how vaccines work to protect individuals and the public, and how anti-intoxicant vaccines are similar and different from traditional vaccine. It mentions legal precedent for vaccination mandates and constitutionality of new vaccine mandates in light of recent vaccine developments. It also mentions public health concern of problematic drug use and universal anti-intoxicant mandate.
- Subjects
UNITED States; JACOBSON v. Massachusetts (Supreme Court case); VACCINATION; VACCINES; PUBLIC health; DRUG abuse; VACCINATION policies; PREVENTION of communicable diseases; IMMUNIZATION; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL protocols; PATIENTS' rights; GOVERNMENT regulation; LAW; LEGISLATION
- Publication
American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2017, Vol 43, Issue 1, p57
- ISSN
0098-8588
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1177/0098858817707987