We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Neo-Frankfurtians and buffer cases: the new challenge to the principle of alternative possibilities.
- Authors
Franklin, Christopher Evan
- Abstract
The debate over whether Frankfurt-style cases are counterexamples to the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP) has taken an interesting turn in recent years. Frankfurt originally envisaged his attack as an attempting to show that PAP is false-that the ability to do otherwise is not necessary for moral responsibility. To many this attack has failed. But Frankfurtians have not conceded defeat. Neo-Frankfurtians, as I will call them, argue that the upshot of Frankfurt-style cases is not that PAP is false, but that it is explanatorily irrelevant. Derk Pereboom and David Hunt's buffer cases are tailor made to establish this conclusion. In this paper I come to the aid of PAP, showing that buffer cases provide no reason for doubting either its truth or relevance with respect to explaining an agent's moral responsibility.
- Subjects
RESPONSIBILITY; POSSIBILITY; HUNT, David; PEREBOOM, Derk; TRUTH
- Publication
Philosophical Studies, 2011, Vol 152, Issue 2, p189
- ISSN
0031-8116
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11098-009-9472-9