We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Hedonic Damages, Hedonic Adaptation, and Disability.
- Authors
Bagenstos, Samuel R.; Schlanger, Margo
- Abstract
This Article contributes to the broad debate over ‘adaptive preferences’ in law, economics, and political philosophy by addressing an important ongoing controversy in tort law. Hedonic damages compensate individuals for the lost enjoyment of life that results from a tortious injury. Lawyers seeking hedonic damages in personal injury cases emphasize their clients' new status as compromised and damaged persons, and courts frequently uphold jury verdicts awarding hedonic damages to individuals who experienced disabling injuries based on a view that disability necessarily limits one's enjoyment of life. This view is consonant with a general societal understanding of disability as a tragedy and of people with disabilities as natural objects of pity. But a rich psychological literature demonstrates that disability does not inherently limit enjoyment of life to the degree that these courts suggest. Rather, people who experience disabling injuries tend to adapt to their disabilities. To be sure, the views of people with disabilities about their own quality of life are classic adaptive preferences. Accordingly, one might suggest that the legal system should disregard those views. But this Article argues that the legal system goes wrong by so devaluing the experience of people with disabilities. When courts award damages based on the (nondisabled person's) view that disability is tragic, they distract attention from the societal choices and stigmas that attach disadvantage to disability; they also make it harder for people with disabilities to make hedonic adjustments to their conditions.
- Subjects
HEDONIC damages; TORTS; ADAPTABILITY (Personality); LAW &; economics; POLITICAL philosophy; PERSONAL injuries (Law); LEGAL judgments; PSYCHOLOGICAL literature; PEOPLE with disabilities; CIVIL rights
- Publication
Vanderbilt Law Review, 2007, Vol 60, Issue 3, p745
- ISSN
0042-2533
- Publication type
Article