We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
不同防治措施下2种诱捕器对苹果蠹蛾田间诱集效果比较.
- Authors
秦欢; 乔力潘·也森太; 塔马夏·吾拉力别克; 孙惠敏; 冯丽凯; 王少山
- Abstract
【Objective】 To explore the trapping effects of triangle traps and paper traps under the four conditions: the absence of control measure, synthetic sex pheromone measures, synthetic sex pheromone measures plus chemical comprehensive control and chemical control measures. 【Methods】 In 2020, various control areas were set up in the Shihezi 152th regimental farm orchard with two traps hung. From May 25 to July 27, the trapping amount and dynamics of Cydia pomonella (L. ) adults in each trap were investigated during the occurrence and hazard period of C.pomonella. 【Results】 The trapping effect of paper traps is better than triangle traps among all the prevention measures; the triangle trap had better adaptability in different weather changes than the paper trap; Among various control measures the control effect of synthetic sex pheromone control area was better than that of comprehensive control area, but the difference did not reach a significant level. The chemical control zone has the worst control effect. 【Conclusion】 The field trapping effect of paper traps is obviously better than that of triangle traps(1,494 > 933),Compared with chemical drugs, synthetic sex pheromone has significant effects on preventing and controlling C. pomonella (P<0.05).
- Publication
Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, Vol 59, Issue 3, p683
- ISSN
1001-4330
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.03.018