We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Olmsteadian Seizure Clause: The Fourth Amendment and the Seizure of Intangible Property.
- Authors
OHM, PAUL
- Abstract
The article focuses on several U.S. supreme court cases related to the seizure of intangible property, and discusses the constitutional values of the Seizure Clause as well as the Search Clause of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It discusses the cases such as Olmstead v. United States, Katz v. United States and United States v. Berger, and mentions how the Seizure Clause is interpreted to protect only the physical property rights and to regulate only the deprivation of tangible things. It also discusses the protection of privacy, property and security provided by the Fourth Amendment, and the damaging effects of intangible property rights on an individual's liberty and the privacy of data.
- Subjects
UNITED States; INTANGIBLE property; SEARCHES &; seizures (Law); PRIVACY; LIBERTY; LAW enforcement; UNITED States. Constitution. 4th Amendment; OLMSTEAD v. United States (Supreme Court case); KATZ v. United States; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Stanford Technology Law Review, 2008, Issue 2, p1
- ISSN
1098-4267
- Publication type
Article