We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
LinkedIn‐based assessments of applicant personality, cognitive ability, and likelihood of organizational citizenship behaviors: Comparing self‐, other‐, and language‐based automated ratings.
- Authors
Roulin, Nicolas; Stronach, Rhea
- Abstract
We compared self‐reports or test‐based assessments of personality, cognitive ability, and likelihood or tendencies to engage in organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) from experienced workers (targets, N = 154) with one approach to rate these traits based on LinkedIn profiles using hiring professionals (panel raters, N = 200), graduate students in Industrial‐Organizational Psychology (I‐O raters, N = 6), and automated assessments with the language‐based tool Receptiviti (for personality only). We also explored the potential for adverse impact associated with this approach of LinkedIn profile assessments and how profile elements are associated with ratings. Results demonstrated that raters can reliably assess personality, cognitive ability, and OCB with one‐item measures. LinkedIn showed little promise for valid assessments of personality (except some weak evidence for honesty‐humility) and OCB tendencies for all data sources. And, we only found modest evidence of convergent validity for cognitive ability. Automated assessments of personality with Receptiviti were more consistent with raters' assessments than targets' self‐reports. LinkedIn‐based hiring recommendations did also not differ on the basis of gender, race, or age. Finally, in terms of profile content, longer LinkedIn profiles with more professional connections, more skills listed, or including a professional picture were viewed more positively by both types of raters. But these content elements were largely unrelated to targets' self‐reports or test scores. Thus, organizations should be careful when relying on LinkedIn‐based assessments of applicants' traits. Practitioner points: Cyber‐vetting job applicants' social media profiles have become popular, but research is lagging behind practice.We examined LinkedIn‐based assessments of personality, cognitive ability, and likelihood of OCB.Human ratings were generally reliable and associated with limited adverse impact.Evidence of convergent validity was limited, and only visible for cognitive ability and honesty‐humility.
- Subjects
ORGANIZATIONAL citizenship behavior; PERSONALITY assessment; COGNITIVE ability; EMPLOYMENT interviewing; JOB applications; HYACINTHOIDES; TEST validity
- Publication
International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 2022, Vol 30, Issue 4, p503
- ISSN
0965-075X
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/ijsa.12396