We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Investigating assumptions of vulnerability: A case study of the exclusion of psychiatric inpatients as participants in genetic research in low- and middle-income contexts.
- Authors
Palk, Andrea C.; Bitta, Mary; Kamaara, Eunice; Stein, Dan J.; Singh, Ilina
- Abstract
Psychiatric genetic research investigates the genetic basis of psychiatric disorders with the aim of more effectively understanding, treating, or, ultimately, preventing such disorders. Given the challenges of recruiting research participants into such studies, the potential for long-term benefits of such research, and seemingly minimal risk, a strong claim could be made that all non-acute psychiatric inpatients, including forensic and involuntary patients, should be included in such research, provided they have capacity to consent. There are tensions, however, regarding the ethics of recruiting psychiatric inpatients into such studies. In this paper our intention is to elucidate the source of these tensions from the perspective of research ethics committee interests and decision-making. We begin by defining inpatient status and outline some of the assumptions surrounding the structures of inpatient care. We then introduce contemporary conceptions of vulnerability, including Florencia Luna's account of vulnerability which we use as a framework for our analysis. While psychiatric inpatients could be subject to consent-related vulnerabilities, we suggest that a particular kind of exploitation-related vulnerability comes to the fore in the context of our case study. Moreover, a subset of these ethical concerns takes on particular weight in the context of genetic research in low- and middle-income countries. At the same time, the automatic exclusion of inpatients from research elicits justice-related vulnerabilities.
- Subjects
SUB-Saharan Africa; HUMAN research subjects; RESEARCH ethics; INPATIENT care; PSYCHIATRIC research; MIDDLE-income countries; CONCEPTION; RESEARCH; HOSPITAL patients; PATIENT selection; RESEARCH methodology; INSTITUTIONAL review boards; MEDICAL cooperation; EVALUATION research; INFORMED consent (Medical law); COMPARATIVE studies; DEVELOPING countries; GENETIC research; MENTAL illness
- Publication
Developing World Bioethics, 2020, Vol 20, Issue 3, p157
- ISSN
1471-8731
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1111/dewb.12251