We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment.
- Authors
Pereira, Andrea; van Prooijen, Jan-Willem
- Abstract
Because punishments are expected to give offenders what they deserve proportionally to the severity of their offenses, the punishment of an entire group because of the misdeed of a few of its members is generally considered as unfair. Group entitativity might increase support for such collective punishment, because members of highly entitative groups are perceived as more similar and interchangeable. We designed three experiments comparing support for third-party collective punishment of low versus high entitative groups. As comparison base-rate, we included conditions in which participants punish an individual wrongdoer (Experiments 1 & 2). Results show that although support for individual punishment is higher than support for collective punishment, this difference was reduced (Experiment 1) or absent (Experiment 2) when the group was highly entitative. Experiment 3 replicated the increasing effect of group entitativity on support for collective punishment. We conclude that group entitativity increases the likelihood of an entire group being treated as a single unit, facilitating collective punishment when a few group members commit an offense.
- Subjects
GROUP entitavity; COLLECTIVE punishment; INTERCHANGEABLE mechanisms; THIRD-party logistics; LIKELIHOOD ratio tests
- Publication
PLoS ONE, 2018, Vol 13, Issue 5, p1
- ISSN
1932-6203
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0196852