We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Problems of commitment in arming and war: how insecurity and destruction matter.
- Authors
Garfinkel, Michelle R.; Syropoulos, Constantinos
- Abstract
This paper analyzes a guns-versus-butter model in which two agents compete for control over an insecure portion of their combined output. They can resolve this dispute either peacefully through settlement or by military force through open conflict (war). Both types of conflict resolution depend on the agents' arming choices, but only war is destructive. We find that, insofar as entering into binding contracts on arms is not possible and agents must arm even under settlement to secure a bigger share of the contested output, the absence of long-term commitments need not be essential in understanding the outbreak of destructive war. Instead, the ability to make short-term commitments could induce war. More generally, our analysis highlights how the pattern of war's destructive effects, the degree of output insecurity and the initial distribution of resources matter for arming decisions and the choice between peace and war. We also explore the implications of transfers for peace.
- Subjects
WAR; MILITARY weapons; PEACE; DECISION making in international relations; COMMITMENT (Psychology); NATIONAL security
- Publication
Public Choice, 2019, Vol 178, Issue 3/4, p349
- ISSN
0048-5829
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11127-018-0601-x