We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Comments on Carnahan, Anderson, and Wolterstorff.
- Authors
Eberle, Christopher
- Abstract
In this paper, I reflect on a number of issues raised in Kevin Carnahan's 'Religion, and not just Religious Reasons, in the Public Square: A Consideration of Robert Audi's and Nicholas Wolterstorff's Religion in the Public Square' and Eric A. Anderson's 'Religiously Conservative Citizens and the Ideal of Conscientious Engagement: A Comment on Wolterstorff and Eberle.' In response to Carnahan, I argue that recent discussions of the proper public role of religious reason do not depend on an objectionable conception of religion. I also respond to Anderson's concern that my 'ideal of conscientious engagement' is an insufficiently robust alternative to public reason liberalism.
- Subjects
CARNAHAN, Kevin; PHILOSOPHY &; religion; LIBERALISM; REASON; FAITH &; reason
- Publication
Philosophia, 2013, Vol 41, Issue 2, p437
- ISSN
0048-3893
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11406-013-9442-5