We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Theories of Antidiscrimination Law.
- Authors
Sangiuliano, Anthony
- Abstract
This article restates and critically analyses two prevalent philosophical approaches towards studying antidiscrimination law. So-called 'bottom-up' approaches are committed to 'moralism', the view that a discriminatory act's being morally wrong gives a reason to legally prohibit it, and a 'prescriptive' method for theorising about antidiscrimination law, which constructs a theory of the moral wrongness of discrimination as an abstract standard for appraising existing law. 'Top-down' approaches are committed to 'instrumentalism', the view that the law's purpose is not to reflect private interpersonal morality, but to function as a tool for promoting a valuable social goal and an 'interpretive' method that seeks to justify existing antidiscrimination law. After canvassing alternative approaches, I explain how the influence of antidiscrimination on our moral intuitions about discrimination reveals a connection between prescriptivism and interpretivism. I then argue that interpretivism imposes constraints on accounts of antidiscrimination law's purpose that are difficult for moralism to satisfy.
- Subjects
ANTI-discrimination laws; ETHICS; DISCRIMINATION (Sociology); INSTRUMENTALISM (Philosophy); METHODOLOGY
- Publication
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2022, Vol 42, Issue 4, p1118
- ISSN
0143-6503
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/ojls/gqac019