We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
William Laud and the Parliamentary Politics of 1628-9.
- Authors
Parry, Mark
- Abstract
This article seeks to highlight the important part played by Bishop William Laud in the counsels of Charles I in the 1620s, and, in particular, his involvement in the parliamentary sessions of 1628 and 1629. Having demonstrated his usefulness as a parliamentary spokesman for the crown in the parliaments of 1625 and 1626, and having been promoted to the privy council, the parliament of 1628-9 witnessed the height of Laud's parliamentary engagement. His key role as a writer of memoranda and speeches both for the duke of Buckingham and for Charles himself demonstrate the weight accorded to his political views. These views, reflected in his writings, sermons and his contributions to parliamentary debate, embody a dislike of parliamentary bargaining, a firm commitment to uphold the royal prerogative, particularly in matters of taxation, and a determination to resist encroachments upon it by the common lawyers, whether by the confirmation of Magna Carta or in the form of the Petition of Right. The expression of these views in such an emphatic fashion would come back to bite him, in the parliamentary attacks on him in 1629, but above all at his trial in 1644. Nevertheless, his articulation of them suggests that Laud himself was a more considered political thinker, and a more active politician, than he has hitherto been given credit for, and that there were ideas around in influential conciliar circles that do not appear to reflect the 'anti-absolutist' consensus that, it is widely claimed, prevailed within the early Stuart political nation.
- Subjects
LAUD, William, 1573-1645; CHARLES I, King of England, 1600-1649; TAXATION; MAGNA Carta; COMMON law; EPISTLE III, to Allen Lord Bathurst (Poem : Pope). The Duke of Buckingham; ARMINIANS
- Publication
Parliamentary History, 2017, Vol 36, Issue 2, p137
- ISSN
0264-2824
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/1750-0206.12292