We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Podiatry intervention versus usual care to prevent falls in care homes: pilot randomised controlled trial (the PIRFECT study).
- Authors
Wylie, Gavin; Menz, Hylton B.; McFarlane, Sarah; Ogston, Simon; Sullivan, Frank; Williams, Brian; Zoe Young; Morris, Jacqui; Young, Zoe
- Abstract
<bold>Background: </bold>Common foot problems are independent risk factors for falls in older people. There is evidence that podiatry can prevent falls in community-dwelling populations. The feasibility of implementing a podiatry intervention and trial in the care home population is unknown. To inform a potential future definitive trial, we performed a pilot randomised controlled trial to assess: (i) the feasibility of a trial of a podiatry intervention to reduce care home falls, and (ii) the potential direction and magnitude of the effect of the intervention in terms of number of falls in care home residents.<bold>Methods: </bold>Informed by Medical Research Council guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions, we conducted a single blind, pilot randomised controlled trial in six care homes in the East of Scotland. Participants were randomised to either: (i) a three month podiatry intervention comprising core podiatry care, foot and ankle exercises, orthoses and footwear provision or (ii) usual care. Falls-related outcomes (number of falls, time to first fall) and feasibility-related outcomes (recruitment, retention, adherence, data collection rates) were collected. Secondary outcomes included: generic health status, balance, mobility, falls efficacy, and ankle joint strength.<bold>Results: </bold>474 care home residents were screened. 43 (9.1%) participants were recruited: 23 to the intervention, 20 to control. Nine (21%) participants were lost to follow-up due to declining health or death. It was feasible to deliver the trial elements in the care home setting. 35% of participants completed the exercise programme. 48% reported using the orthoses 'all or most of the time'. Completion rates of the outcome measures were between 93% and 100%. No adverse events were reported. At the nine month follow-up period, the intervention group per-person fall rate was 0.77 falls vs. 0.83 falls in the control group.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A podiatry intervention to reduce falls can be delivered to care home residents within a pilot randomised controlled trial of the intervention. Although not powered to determine effectiveness, these preliminary data provide justification for a larger trial, incorporating a full process evaluation, to determine whether this intervention can significantly reduce falls in this high-risk population.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02178527 ; Date of registration: 17 June 2014.
- Subjects
UNITED Kingdom; SCOTLAND; PODIATRY; RISK factors of accidental falls in old age; NURSING home care; NURSING care facilities; COMPARATIVE studies; EXERCISE therapy; ACCIDENTAL falls; LONGITUDINAL method; RESEARCH methodology; MEDICAL cooperation; HEALTH outcome assessment; RESEARCH; RESEARCH funding; PILOT projects; EVALUATION research; SENIOR housing; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; BLIND experiment; FOOT orthoses
- Publication
BMC Geriatrics, 2017, Vol 17, p1
- ISSN
1471-2318
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1186/s12877-017-0541-1