We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
SCIENCE, PATENT LAW, AND EPISTEMIC LEGITIMACY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF TECHNICALLY TRAINED FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUDGES.
- Authors
Stiernberg, Charlie
- Abstract
The article presents an empirical study on the technically trained judges of the U.S. Federal circuit judges. It discusses the model of epistemic deference originally propounded by Scott Brewer, law professor of the Harvard Law School, under influence of the Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. it interprets the patent claims to discuss the relationship between science and law with relevance to the Supreme Court case Markman v. Westview Instruments Inc.
- Subjects
UNITED States; JUDGES; SCIENCE &; law; UNITED States. Supreme Court; DAUBERT v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.; MARKMAN v. Westview Instruments Inc. (Supreme Court case); PATENT claim interpretation
- Publication
Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2013, Vol 27, Issue 1, p279
- ISSN
0897-3393
- Publication type
Article