We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
TORTS LAW: BLURRED ELEMENTS: THE NEBULOUS NATURE OF FORESEEABILITY, THE CONFOUNDING QUALITY OF MISFEASANCE, AND THE MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT'S DECISION--DOE 169 V. BRANDON.
- Authors
McDonald, Cara
- Abstract
The article discusses the Minnesota Supreme Court's ruling in the 2014 case Doe 169 v. Brandon which deals with the state's tort laws, a foreseeability legal doctrine, and the determination that a church licensing body did not owe a duty to protect a minor from the intentional and tortious conduct of a third party. Negligence law and the procedural posture of the Doe 169 case are examined, along with summary judgments and legal exceptions under Minnesota law.
- Subjects
UNITED States; INTENTIONAL torts; FORESEEABILITY (Law); MINORS; THIRD parties (Law); LEGAL procedure; SUMMARY judgments; EXCEPTIONS (Law); MINNESOTA. Supreme Court; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
William Mitchell Law Review, 2015, Vol 41, Issue 1, p365
- ISSN
0270-272X
- Publication type
Article