We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Conditional preferences and practical conditionals.
- Authors
Charlow, Nate
- Abstract
I argue that taking the Practical Conditionals Thesis (PCT) seriously demands a new understanding of the semantics of such conditionals. Paul Weirich has argued that the conditional utility of a state of affairs B on A is to be identified as the degree to which it is desired under indicative supposition that A. Similarly, exploiting the PCT, I will argue that the proper analysis of indicative practical (as well as imperative) conditionals is in terms of what is planned, desired, or preferred, given suppositional changes to an agent's information. Implementing such a conception of conditional preference in a semantic analysis of indicative practical conditionals turns out to be incompatible with any approach which treats the indicative conditional as expressing non-vacuous universal quantification over some domain of relevant antecedent-possibilities. Such analyses, I argue, encode a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is to be best, given some condition. The analysis that does the best vis-à-vis the PCT is, instead, one that blends (i) a Context-Shifty account of indicative antecedents with (ii) an Expressivistic, or non-propositional, treatment of their practical consequents.
- Subjects
SEMANTICS; IMPERATIVE (Grammar); CONDITIONALS (Grammar); LINGUISTIC context; SEMANTIC networks (Information theory); WEIRICH, Paul
- Publication
Linguistics & Philosophy, 2013, Vol 36, Issue 6, p463
- ISSN
0165-0157
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10988-013-9143-3