We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
KAVL-İ KADÎM VE KAVL-İ CEDÎD AYRIMININ İMAM ŞÂFİÎ’NİN USÛL ANLAYIŞINA YANSIMASI.
- Authors
Yaşar, Mehmet Aziz
- Abstract
Imam Shafi'i's meeting with many scholars who have different interpretation methods and moving around in many different regions in terms of tradition and culture has been an important influence on his thought. This has caused Shafi'i to change or rearrange many thoughts. In this context, in general Shafi'i's pre-Egyptian views are called old doctrine and post-Egyptian ones are new. Though the mentioned change is not as intense as it is in fiqh, his method is reflected in his thoughts. It is determined that Shafi'i is influenced by the difference between the old doctrine and the new doctrine which constitutes an important turning point in the opinion of Şafi'i in the opinion of the following methods: The formation of the evidence of the companionship, the sunnah of the companions of the companion, the introduction and general allocation of the word "sahâbe",The medina has to work with the consensus of Ehlin, the value of the evidence of hadiths conveyed by tâbiîn and the source value of masalih-i mursala. In order to better understand the subject in the study, it will first be tried to examine the old and new phenomena in the Shafi'i sect. Subsequently, Shafi'i's approach to the issues referred to in the old sect will be examined, and it will be attempted to indicate which of the previous scholars influenced this approach. it will try to determine which one of the old ways of betting in the new view has given up and continues to act with which. Moreover, according to its old methodical viewpoints, the opinions and the patients of the later methodolist will also be included.
- Subjects
ASH-Shafi'i, Imam; JURISTIC persons (Islamic law); MEDINA Group; HADITH; LEGAL evidence
- Publication
Electronic Turkish Studies, 2018, Vol 13, Issue 17, p353
- ISSN
1308-2140
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.7827/TurkishStudies.14061