The article discusses the social legal theory (SLT) integration into a fully systematized vision of law. It mentions mutation openly embraces holism and naturalism, two of the central legs of jurisilience and shows that SLT did not just adapt, as Tamanaha claims. It also mentions Tamanaha's renditions of realism, holism, naturalism, and emergence are so amoebic, they may not even suffice as a standalone system theory.