We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Soteriological Mereology in the Pāli Discourses, Buddhaghosa, and Huayan Buddhism.
- Authors
Jones, Nicholaos
- Abstract
Extant discussions of Buddhist mereology give minimal attention to the soteriological significance of denying the reality of wholes. This is unfortunate, because the connection between mereology and soteriological is both significant and problematic. The connection is significant, because it supports an argument for the unreality of composite wholes that does not depend upon any claim about the nature of wholes. The connection is also problematic, because some Buddhists endorse the soteriological relevance of mereology despite admitting that composite wholes are real. I address these issues by reviewing early Pāli Buddhist attitudes toward the soteriological significance of mereology, developing an argument for the unreality of wholes from the work of Buddhaghosa, and explicating an alternative approach from the Chinese tradition of Huayan 華嚴 Buddhism that calls into question some common assumptions about parts and wholes.
- Subjects
WHOLE &; parts (Philosophy); PALI language; DISCOURSE; BUDDHAGHOSA, 5th century; HUA yan Buddhism
- Publication
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 2023, Vol 22, Issue 1, p117
- ISSN
1540-3009
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11712-022-09869-1