We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Bad Words.
- Authors
Bruce, Courtenay R.; Smith, Martin L.; Peña, Adam M.; Majumder, Mary A.
- Abstract
The clinical ethicist met with Ms. H to clarify what information she wants and does not want to know. First, she wants to receive any treatment that could prolong her life, regardless of how the treatment affects her ability to engage in activities of daily living. Second, she wants to be included in the decision-making process as much as possible, as long as clinicians use only 'positive' language. Ms. H considers the words 'dying,' 'chemotherapy,' 'radiation,' and 'cancer' to be 'bad words.' For conversations in which these words cannot be avoided, she wants her clinicians to talk to her son. Her desired engagement includes hearing about risks, benefits, and alternatives to treatments if clinicians use only 'positive' language. Finally, she says that she rarely sees doctors and that she is 'very scared' of hospitals, despite exhibiting a comfortable demeanor. Should clinicians honor Ms. H's waiver of specified information and, if so, to what degree?
- Subjects
PHYSICIAN-patient relations; PHYSICIANS; DISCLOSURE; DECISION making; LANGUAGE &; languages; PATIENTS; LEGAL status of patients; PATIENTS' rights; ETHICS
- Publication
Hastings Center Report, 2014, Vol 44, Issue 2, p13
- ISSN
0093-0334
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/hast.280