We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Real-world data from a molecular tumor board demonstrates improved outcomes with a precision N-of-One strategy.
- Authors
Kato, Shumei; Kim, Ki Hwan; Lim, Hyo Jeong; Boichard, Amelie; Nikanjam, Mina; Weihe, Elizabeth; Kuo, Dennis J.; Eskander, Ramez N.; Goodman, Aaron; Galanina, Natalie; Fanta, Paul T.; Schwab, Richard B.; Shatsky, Rebecca; Plaxe, Steven C.; Sharabi, Andrew; Stites, Edward; Adashek, Jacob J.; Okamura, Ryosuke; Lee, Suzanna; Lippman, Scott M.
- Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can identify novel cancer targets. However, interpreting the molecular findings and accessing drugs/clinical trials is challenging. Furthermore, many tumors show resistance to monotherapies. To implement a precision strategy, we initiated a multidisciplinary (basic/translational/clinical investigators, bioinformaticians, geneticists, and physicians from multiple specialties) molecular tumor board (MTB), which included a project manager to facilitate obtaining clinical-grade biomarkers (blood/tissue NGS, specific immunohistochemistry/RNA expression including for immune-biomarkers, per physician discretion) and medication-acquisition specialists/clinical trial coordinators/navigators to assist with medication access. The MTB comprehensively reviewed patient characteristics to develop N-of-One treatments implemented by the treating physician's direction under the auspices of a master protocol. Overall, 265/429 therapy-evaluable patients (62%) were matched to ≥1 recommended drug. Eighty-six patients (20%) matched to all drugs recommended by MTB, including combinatorial approaches, while 38% received physician's choice regimen, generally with unmatched approach/low degree of matching. Our results show that patients who receive MTB-recommended regimens (versus physician choice) have significantly longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and are better matched to therapy. High (≥50%) versus low (<50%) Matching Score therapy (roughly reflecting therapy matched to ≥50% versus <50% of alterations) independently correlates with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–0.80; P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50–0.90; P = 0.007) and higher stable disease ≥6 months/partial/complete remission rate (52.1% versus 30.4% P < 0.001) (all multivariate). In conclusion, patients who receive MTB-based therapy are better matched to their genomic alterations, and the degree of matching is an independent predictor of improved oncologic outcomes including survival. A molecular tumor board (MTB) is often used as a platform that integrates clinical and molecular parameters for clinical decision making. Here, the authors review the outcome of 715 cancer patients presented at their institution's MTB, and demonstrate that patients who received a MTB-recommended regimen received therapy that was better matched to their alterations and achieved better clinical outcomes.
- Subjects
PROGRESSION-free survival; MEDICAL research personnel; NUCLEOTIDE sequencing; DRUG accessibility; CANCER patients; PROJECT managers
- Publication
Nature Communications, 2020, Vol 11, Issue 1, pN.PAG
- ISSN
2041-1723
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1038/s41467-020-18613-3