We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Effect of physical therapy timing on patient‐reported outcomes for individuals with acute low back pain: A systematic review with meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Authors
McDevitt, Amy W.; Cooper, Catherine G.; Friedrich, Jason M.; Anderson, Dustin J. M.; Arnold, Elizabeth A.; Clewley, Derek J.
- Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this systematic review with meta‐analysis was to investigate the effect of early physical therapy (PT) for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) on patient‐reported outcomes of pain and disability, compared to delayed PT or non‐PT care. Literature Survey: Randomized controlled trials in three electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase) were searched from inception to June 12, 2020, and updated on September 23, 2021. Methodology: Eligible participants were individuals with acute low back pain. The intervention was early PT compared to delayed PT or non‐PT care. Primary outcomes included the patient‐reported outcomes of pain and disability. The following information was extracted from included articles: demographic data, sample size, selection criteria, PT interventions, and pain and disability outcomes. Data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Random effects models were used for the meta‐analysis. Synthesis: Seven of 391 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. Random effects meta‐analysis comparing early PT to non‐PT care for acute LBP indicated a significant reduction in pain (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.69 to −0.17) and disability (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI: −0.57 to −0.16) in the short term. Early PT compared to delayed PT did not result in improvement in short‐term pain (SMD = −0.24, 95% CI: −0.52 to 0.04) or disability (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: −0.56 to 0.01), or long‐term pain (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: −0.15 to 0.57) or disability (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: −0.15 to 0.42). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta‐analysis suggest early PT versus non‐PT care is associated with statistically significant reductions in short‐term pain and disability (up to 6 weeks) with small effect sizes. The results indicate a nonsignificant trend favoring a small benefit of early PT over delayed PT for outcomes at short‐term follow‐up but no effect at long‐term follow‐up (6 months or greater).
- Subjects
LUMBAR pain; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; PHYSICAL therapy; RANDOM effects model; PAIN management; BACK exercises
- Publication
PM & R: Journal of Injury, Function & Rehabilitation, 2023, Vol 15, Issue 11, p1466
- ISSN
1934-1482
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/pmrj.12984