We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Effect of minimum diameter at breast height and standing dead wood field measurements on the accuracy of ALS-based forest inventory.
- Authors
Keränen, Juha; Peuhkurinen, Jussi; Packalen, Petteri; Maltamo, Matti
- Abstract
Where airborne laser scanning (ALS) measures the entire aboveground vegetation, the target of a stand-level forest inventory is usually the living tree stock above a given diameter but excluding standing dead trees. The aim here was to investigate the effects of varying field-measured minimum diameters (3-10 cm) and standing dead wood on ALS-based forest inventories. The characteristics considered in this case were volume, basal area, number of stems, mean diameter, and mean height for each species, as well as the total growing stock and the total aboveground biomass. The field data comprised measurements of all trees that were ≥3 cm at breast height (1.3 m) on 601 sample plots located in pine-dominated managed forests in eastern Finland. The results showed that the minimum diameter had a significant effect on the estimates obtained in young forests, for which the three smallest minimum diameter datasets (3, 4, and 5 cm) gave the most accurate estimates. Minimum diameter had no marked influence in the case of middle-aged or mature forests. The inclusion of standing dead trees did not have any effect on the estimates of living tree characteristics. The effect of minimum diameter is minor where large-area inventory applications are concerned; however, especially from a silvicultural point of a view, a minimum diameter of 3 cm should be employed in young forests, for which a large proportion of the tree stock usually consists of small trees, i.e., with diameters of <5 cm.
- Subjects
FOREST surveys; DEAD trees; AIRBORNE lasers; FORESTS &; forestry; PLANT biomass; PLANT species
- Publication
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2015, Vol 45, Issue 10, p1280
- ISSN
0045-5067
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1139/cjfr-2015-0103