We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Lung-protective mechanical ventilation for patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.
- Authors
Nguyen, Trung Kien; Nguyen, Viet Luong; Nguyen, Truong Giang; Mai, Duc Hanh; Nguyen, Ngoc Quynh; Vu, The Anh; Le, Anh Nguyet; Nguyen, Quang Huy; Nguyen, Chi Tue; Nguyen, Dang Thu
- Abstract
Background: Pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position in laparoscopic surgeries could contribute to postoperative pulmonary dysfunction. In recent years, intraoperative lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPV) has been reportedly able to attenuate ventilator-induced lung injuries (VILI). Our objectives were to test the hypothesis that LPV could improve intraoperative oxygenation function, pulmonary mechanics and early postoperative atelectasis in laparoscopic surgeries. Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 62 patients indicated for elective abdominal laparoscopic surgeries with an expected duration of greater than 2 h were randomly assigned to receive either lung-protective ventilation (LPV) with a tidal volume (Vt) of 7 ml kg− 1 ideal body weight (IBW), 10 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) combined with regular recruitment maneuvers (RMs) or conventional ventilation (CV) with a Vt of 10 ml kg− 1 IBW, 0 cmH2O in PEEP and no RMs. The primary endpoints were the changes in the ratio of PaO2 to FiO2 (P/F). The secondary endpoints were the differences between the two groups in PaO2, alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aO2), intraoperative pulmonary mechanics and the incidence of atelectasis detected on chest x-ray on the first postoperative day. Results: In comparison to CV group, the intraoperative P/F and PaO2 in LPV group were significantly higher while the intraoperative A-aO2 was clearly lower. Cdyn and Cstat at all the intraoperative time points in LPV group were significantly higher compared to CV group (p < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of atelectasis on day one after surgery between the two groups. Conclusions: Lung protective mechanical ventilation significantly improved intraoperative pulmonary oxygenation function and pulmonary compliance in patients experiencing various abdominal laparoscopic surgeries, but it could not ameliorate early postoperative atelectasis and oxygenation function on the first day after surgery. Trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/identifier: NCT04546932 (09/05/2020).
- Subjects
LUNG physiology; ABDOMINAL surgery; BODY weight; POSITIVE end-expiratory pressure; LAPAROSCOPIC surgery; ARTIFICIAL respiration; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; STATISTICAL sampling; ATELECTASIS
- Publication
BMC Anesthesiology, 2021, Vol 21, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
1471-2253
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1186/s12871-021-01318-5