We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Meta-analysis for the evaluation of perioperative enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery.
- Authors
Xiaofang Wu; Lingling Liu; Fang Zhou
- Abstract
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynaecological surgery and provide a scientific basis for its clinical promotion and application in the Chinese population. Material and methods: Systematic retrieval from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP database and other Chinese literature databases. Studies on ERAS application with a randomised controlled trial in gynaecological surgery were included in the present report. Outcome indicators: hospitalisation time, postoperative ambulation time, postoperative feeding time, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative defecation time, operation time, postoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, patient satisfaction, hospitalisation expenses, etc. The meta-analysis was performed using the Revman 5.3 software. Results: A total of 24 studies were included in the analysis. The results showed that, compared with the traditional group, the ERAS group had a lower hospitalisation time (SMD = -1.67, 95% CI = -2.03 ~ -1.30, p < 0.0001), postoperative ambulation time (SMD = -4.16, 95% CI = -5.12 ~ -3.20, p < 0.0001), postoperative feeding time (SMD = -7.36, 95% CI = -9.67 ~ -5.05, p < 0.0001), postoperative exhaust time (SMD = -2.59, 95% CI = -3.15 ~ -2.03, p < 0.0001), postoperative defecation time (SMD = -2.23, 95% CI = -2.88 ~ -1.57, p < 0.0001), postoperative morbidity (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.15 ~ 0.31, p < 0.0001) and hospitalisation expenses (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI = -0.78 ~ -0.28, p < 0.0001). The patient satisfaction was significantly improved (odds ratio = 8.11, 95% CI = 4.96 ~ 13.24, p < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups. Conclusions: The application of the ERAS protocol in gynaecological surgery significantly improves the effectiveness and safety of the procedure. Thus, it can be promoted and applied in clinical practice in China.
- Subjects
ENHANCED recovery after surgery protocol; PERIOPERATIVE care; GYNECOLOGIC surgery; PATIENT satisfaction; OPERATIVE blood salvage
- Publication
Ginekologia Polska, 2022, Vol 93, Issue 11, p896
- ISSN
0017-0011
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5603/GP.a2022.0064