We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
- Authors
Zhang, Qiang; Wang, Fei; Chen, Zhen-Yu; Wang, Zhen; Zhi, Fa-Chao; Liu, Si-De; Bai, Yang
- Abstract
Objective: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) is widely used in gastroscopy, especially in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of white light imaging (WLI) and that of ME-NBI for early gastric cancer. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies which met the inclusion criteria. A random-effects model was used to calculate overall sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess the diagnostic efficacy of WLI and ME-NBI in early gastric cancer. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the results. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, and included 1724 patients and 2153 lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer using WLI were 0.48 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.57; I = 78.6 %], 0.67 (95 % CI 0.62-0.71; I = 81.9 %), and 0.62, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC using ME-NBI were 0.83 (95 % CI 0.79-0.87; I = 79.8 %), 0.96 (95 % CI 0.95-0.97; I = 89.3 %), and 0.96, respectively. The studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity. Further sensitivity analysis was mainly performed for the studies of small lesions (mean size 10 mm or less) and the studies with a the score of 12 points or greater in the literature quality assessment, and the AUCs for ME-NBI for diagnosis of early gastric cancer were between 0.93 and 0.98, which suggested that the diagnostic value was still high and stable. Conclusion: Compared with WLI, ME-NBI can effectively diagnose early gastric cancer.
- Subjects
CANCER diagnosis; STOMACH cancer; GASTROSCOPY; IMAGING of cancer; SURVIVAL analysis (Biometry); ENDOSCOPIC surgery; META-analysis
- Publication
Gastric Cancer, 2016, Vol 19, Issue 2, p543
- ISSN
1436-3291
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10120-015-0500-5