We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Physical and Unphysical Causes of Nonstationarity in the Relationship Between Barents‐Kara Sea Ice and the North Atlantic Oscillation.
- Authors
Strommen, Kristian; Cooper, Fenwick C.
- Abstract
The role of internal variability in generating an apparent link between autumn Barents‐Kara sea (BKS) ice and the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) has been intensely debated. In particular, the robustness and causality of the link has been questioned by showing that BKS‐NAO correlations exhibit nonstationarity in both reanalysis and climate model simulations. We show that the lack of ice observations means nonstationarity cannot be confidently assessed using reanalysis prior to 1961. Model simulations are used to corroborate an argument that forced nonstationarity could result from ice edge changes due to global warming. Consequently, the observed change in BKS‐NAO correlations since 1960 might not be purely a result of internal variability and may also reflect that the ice edge has moved. The change could also reflect the availability of more accurate ice observations. We discuss potential implications for analysis based on coupled climate models, which exhibit large ice edge biases. Plain Language Summary: Does the amount of ice in the Barents‐Kara Sea influence European air pressure or are the patterns we see caused by random changes in the weather? In climate models and in estimates of the atmosphere's history these patterns change depending on which years we look at. This has been interpreted as evidence that the patterns are random. However, there are very few measurements of ice in this region before 1961, so we argue that looking at these years is not helpful. Since 1961, where we have more measurements, the winter sea ice edge has been moving Northwards because of global warming. When the ice in a particular region disappears, it changes the expected relationship with the atmosphere because heat can now quickly leave the ocean. We therefore hypothesize that some of the changes seen in the patterns may therefore not be random, but a result of ice edge changes. We also observe that different climate models put the ice edge in different places, and the same hypothesis therefore implies that models might not get potential ice‐air pressure relationships in specific regions correct. Key Points: A lack of observations means that ice‐NAO links cannot be confidently assessed with reanalysis prior to 1961Nonstationarity since 1961 may reflect forced changes to the ice edge, due to the dependence of heatflux anomalies on ice edge variabilityThe magnitude of this potential forced nonstationarity in the real world is currently unclear
- Subjects
NORTH Atlantic oscillation; SEA ice; ATMOSPHERIC models; AIR pressure; GLOBAL warming; AUTUMN
- Publication
Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, Vol 51, Issue 11, p1
- ISSN
0094-8276
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1029/2023GL107609