We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Lucretius' Allegoresis and Invective: De rerum natura 2.598-660.
- Authors
Domaradzki, Mikolaj
- Abstract
The present paper suggests that Lucretius' Magna Mater interpretation (2.598-660) can fruitfully be approached through the lens of invective oratory. While this difficult passage of De rerum natura has long puzzled scholars, this article argues that in his interpretation Lucretius masterfully transforms the encomiastic topos of allegoresis into a powerful means of blame: the poet allegorically interprets various aspects of the cult of Cybele with a view to showing how religious convictions and customs go awry. When thus exposing the cult as impious, Lucretius ingeniously exploits several topoi of rhetorical hymns (nurture, propitiation, etc.) for the purpose of making his vituperation all the more compelling. Hence, on the reading advocated here, the Magna Mater interpretation is a carefully constructed invective against those aspects of the cult (of Cybele) which an Epicurean is bound to frown upon (providential illusion, divine punishment, etc.).
- Subjects
ORATORY; SCHOLARS; CYBELE (Goddess); HYMNS; CULTURE
- Publication
Mnemosyne, 2024, Vol 77, Issue 3, p405
- ISSN
0026-7074
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1163/1568525x-bja10207