We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Alcohol and smoking brief interventions by socioeconomic position: a population-based, cross-sectional study in Great Britain.
- Authors
Buss, Vera Helen; Cox, Sharon; Moore, Graham; Angus, Colin; Shahab, Lion; Bauld, Linda; Brown, Jamie
- Abstract
Background: Alcohol and smoking brief interventions (BIs) in general practice have been shown to be effective in lowering alcohol and smoking-related harm. Aim: To assess prevalence of self-reported BI receipt among increasing or higher-risk drinkers and past-year smokers in England, Scotland, and Wales, and associations between intervention receipt and socioeconomic position. Design & setting: Cross-sectional study using data from a monthly population-based survey in England, Scotland, and Wales. Method: The study comprised 47 799 participants (15 573 increasing or higher-risk drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test consumption score ≥5] and 7791 past-year smokers) surveyed via telephone in 2020-2022 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). All data were self-reported. Prevalence of self-reported BI receipt was assessed descriptively; associations between receipt and socioeconomic position were analysed using logistic regression. Results: Among adults in England, Scotland, and Wales, 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.8 to 32.7) reported increasing or higher-risk drinking and 17.7% (95% CI = 17.3 to 18.1) past-year smoking. Among increasing or higher-risk drinkers, 58.0% (95% CI = 57.1 to 58.9) consulted with a GP in the past year, and of these, 4.1% (95% CI = 3.6 to 4.6) reported receiving BIs. Among past-year smokers, 55.8% (95% CI = 54.5 to 57.1) attended general practice in the past year; of these, 41.0% (95% CI = 39.4 to 42.7) stated receiving BIs. There was a tendency for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds to receive more alcohol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.38, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.73) or smoking BIs (aOR 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.26), but for the latter the results were statistically non-significant. Results did not differ notably by nation within Great Britain. Conclusion: BIs in general practice are more common for smoking than for alcohol. A greater proportion of BIs for alcohol were found to be delivered to people who were from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and who were increasing or higher-risk drinkers.
- Subjects
UNITED Kingdom; SCOTLAND; WALES; ENGLAND; ALCOHOLISM treatment; SMOKING prevention; PREVENTION of alcoholism; RISK-taking behavior; CONFIDENCE intervals; SELF-evaluation; EX-smokers; FAMILY medicine; CROSS-sectional method; SOCIAL classes; QUESTIONNAIRES; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; RESEARCH funding; SMOKING; ODDS ratio; DATA analysis software; LONGITUDINAL method; ADULTS
- Publication
BJGP Open, 2023, Vol 7, Issue 4, p1
- ISSN
2398-3795
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0087