We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Effect of an Arsenic Mitigation Program on Arsenic Exposure in American Indian Communities: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Community-Led Strong Heart Water Study Program.
- Authors
George, Christine Marie; Zacher, Tracy; Endres, Kelly; Richards, Francine; Robe, Lisa Bear; Harvey, David; Best, Lyle G.; Cloud, Reno Red; Bear, Annabelle Black; Skinner, Leslie; Cuny, Christa; Rule, Ana; Schwab, Kellogg J.; Gittelsohn, Joel; Glabonjat, Ronald Alexander; Schilling, Kathrin; O'Leary, Marcia; Thomas, Elizabeth D.; Umans, Jason; Zhu, Jianhui
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic arsenic exposure has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease; diabetes; cancers of the lung, pancreas and prostate; and all-cause mortality in American Indian communities in the Strong Heart Study. OBJECTIVE: The Strong Heart Water Study (SHWS) designed and evaluated a multilevel, community-led arsenic mitigation program to reduce arsenic exposure among private well users in partnership with Northern Great Plains American Indian Nations. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the SHWS arsenic mitigation program over a 2-y period on a) urinary arsenic, and b) reported use of arsenic-safe water for drinking and cooking. The cRCT compared the installation of a pointof- use arsenic filter and a mobile Health (mHealth) program (3 phone calls; SHWS mHealth and Filter arm) to a more intensive program, which included this same program plus three home visits (3 phone calls and 3 home visits; SHWS Intensive arm). RESULTS: A 47% reduction in urinary arsenic [geometric mean (GM)=13.2 to 7.0 μg/g creatinine] was observed from baseline to the final follow-up when both study arms were combined. By treatment arm, the reduction in urinary arsenic from baseline to the final follow-up visit was 55% in the mHealth and Filter arm (GM=14.6 to 6.55 μg/g creatinine) and 30% in the Intensive arm (GM=11.2 to 7.82 μg/g creatinine). There was no significant difference in urinary arsenic levels by treatment arm at the final follow-up visit comparing the Intensive vs. mHealth and Filter arms: GM ratio of 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.77, 1.90). In both arms combined, exclusive use of arsenic-safe water from baseline to the final follow-up visit significantly increased for water used for cooking (17% to 53%) and drinking (12% to 46%). DISCUSSION: Delivery of the interventions for the community-led SHWS arsenic mitigation program, including the installation of a point-of-use arsenic filter and a mHealth program on the use of arsenic-safe water (calls only, no home visits), resulted in a significant reduction in urinary arsenic and increases in reported use of arsenic-safe water for drinking and cooking during the 2-y study period. These results demonstrate that the installation of an arsenic filter and phone calls from a mHealth program presents a promising approach to reduce water arsenic exposure among private well users.
- Subjects
NORTH America; WATER pollution prevention; WATER analysis; ARSENIC analysis; ENVIRONMENTAL exposure prevention; COOKING; HOME care services; RESEARCH funding; EVALUATION of human services programs; FILTERS &; filtration; STATISTICAL sampling; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; WATER supply; WATER security; ODDS ratio; ARSENIC poisoning; MASS spectrometry; ARSENIC; CONFIDENCE intervals; DATA analysis software; NATIVE Americans; COMMUNITY-based social services; VIDEO recording; REGRESSION analysis
- Publication
Environmental Health Perspectives, 2024, Vol 132, Issue 3, p037007-1
- ISSN
0091-6765
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1289/EHP12548