We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
国家文化公园研究的路径分析.
- Authors
戴俊骋
- Abstract
The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed the effective building and use of national cultural parks, further indicating the direction for constructing such parks. The building of national cultural parks is a highly significant endeavor and has attracted considerable academic attention. Thus far, research paths have been formed on park cases, national parks, cultural heritage, operation and management, spatial functions, project technologies, and symbolic communication. Among these paths, the park cases path generally selects a certain park or discusses the overall development of these parks regarding the building experience and the practical use of certain types of national cultural parks. The national parks path compares domestic and foreign national park-related laws and regulations, policies and systems, and representative practices and cases of national park planning, construction, management and operation. The cultural heritage path examines the construction of national cultural parks from a linear or regional cultural heritage perspective. The operation and management path focuses on the“meta-questions”of cultural heritage management practices, such as“who should manage?”and“how should they be managed?”The spatial function path focuses on the spatial production mechanism of national cultural parks. The project technologies path explores the role of major projects and technologies in supporting national cultural parks. The symbolic communication path explores how national cultural parks can be disseminated as a symbolic carrier of the Chinese cultural community. The existing research paths generally are problem-oriented and can be conceptualized as a“national cultural park + ”perspective; In other words, exploring a series of issues, such as planning, design, construction, management, and operation of these parks. Besides, is a“+national cultural park”perspective, which is a generalization and sublimation based on the Great Wall, Grand Canal, Long March, Yellow River and Yangtze River National Cultural Parks. These studies all try to solve the problems concerning the national cultural parks, such as inadequate exploration and arranging of local cultural connotations, unclear understanding and positioning of complexity, weak local coordination, and insufficient exploration of transformation mechanisms. Theoretically, further exploration is needed to explain the mechanism issues of horizontal integration of different cultural zones, vertical integration of different scales, and judgmental choices of different values. This study seeks to propose a“321”research framework based on integrating existing research paths; In other words, a systematic framework that explores the relationship between horizontal and vertical pairs and strengthens value research based on the three major elements of national cultural parks—culture, space, and management. The significance of this study is in its organizing and analyzing the research paths for national cultural parks to enable researchers to think and position these parks more clearly in a relatively clear problem domain, theoretical domain, and discourse domain; to identify the research dialogues between national cultural parks and existing cultural heritage, cultural management, cultural communication, cultural space, cultural technology, and other such topics; and to strengthen the relationship between national cultural parks and the Great Wall, Grand Canal, Long March, Yellow River, Yangtze River and other research subjects.
- Subjects
CHINESE Communist Party; NATIONAL parks &; reserves; VERTICAL integration; CULTURAL property; ACCULTURATION; PARK design; COMMUNITIES; OPERATIONS management
- Publication
Tourism Tribune / Lvyou Xuekan, 2023, Vol 38, Issue 6, p40
- ISSN
1002-5006
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2023.06.009