We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
BEYOND UNCONSCIONABILITY: EXPLORING THE CASE FOR A NEW PROHIBITION ON UNFAIR CONDUCT.
- Authors
FELSTEAD, NICHOLAS
- Abstract
Consumer Affairs Australia and New Zealand conducted a wholesale review of the Australian Consumer Law in 2017. Despite calls for the introduction of an 'unfair conduct' prohibition, the review found that a change to the current prohibition on 'unconscionable conduct' was unnecessary in light of the statutory prohibition evolving from its equitable origins. The recent High Court decision in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1 has stifled this development and realigned statutory unconscionability with the restrictive equitable doctrine. In light of curial and extracurial comments from senior members of the judiciary, regulators and commentators, it is appropriate to reconsider the merits of a prohibition on unfair conduct. This article argues that this reform will better promote community understanding, lead to greater certainty in commerce and fulfil the role of a 'safety net' provision in the Australian Consumer Law.
- Subjects
CONSUMER law; AUSTRALIA. High Court; UNCONSCIONABLE contracts; LAW reform; LEGAL doctrines
- Publication
University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2022, Vol 45, Issue 1, p285
- ISSN
0313-0096
- Publication type
Article