We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
TACKLING THE INTANGIBLE: WHY THE SUPREME COURT NEEDS TO DEFINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND WHAT FACEBOOK STANDS TO LOSE (OR WIN).
- Authors
GALGANO, JOHN PAUL A.
- Abstract
The article focuses on issue over internet services provider (ISP) liability in the intellectual property exception. It mentions battle that split a panel of Third Circuit Court of Appeals judges over whether Facebook was immune from Hepp's claim under section 230 the Communications Decency Act (CDA). It also mentions path of internet censorship companies that have websites upon which anyone can post have come to be known as 'platforms," avoiding the liability.
- Subjects
INTERNET service providers; INTELLECTUAL property; FACEBOOK (Web resource); CENSORSHIP; COMMUNICATIONS Decency Act, 1996 (United States)
- Publication
Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2023, Vol 37, Issue 1, p323
- ISSN
0883-3648
- Publication type
Article