We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for femoropopliteal total occlusions: intraluminal versus subintimal approaches.
- Authors
Kim, Yong Hoon; Her, Ae-Young; Ko, Young-Guk; Ahn, Chul-Min; Lee, Seung-Jun; Hong, Myeong-Ki; Yu, Cheol Woong; Lee, Jae-Hwan; Lee, Seung Whan; Youn, Young Jin; Yoon, Chang-Hwan; Rha, Seung-Woon; Min, Pil-Ki; Choi, Seung-Hyuk; Chae, In-Ho; Choi, Donghoon; Kang, Woong Chol; Her, Sung-Ho; Koh, Yoon Seok; Hwang, Byung-Hee
- Abstract
Because there is a lack of comparative studies assessing drug-coated balloon (DCB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) outcomes with respect to intraluminal (IL) and subintimal (SI) approaches in femoropopliteal (FP) total occlusive lesions, we compared the outcomes between DCB (including bailout stenting) and DES treatments for this lesion. A total of 487 limbs (434 patients) were divided into the IL (n = 344, DCB: n = 268, DES: n = 76) and SI (n = 143, DCB: n = 83, DES: n = 60) approach groups. The primary outcome was a major adverse limb event (MALE), defined as above-ankle amputation or repeat revascularization of the index limb. Secondary outcomes included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), loss of clinical patency, and all-cause death. After adjustment, in each IL and SI approach, the 2-year rates of MALE (p = 0.180 and p = 0.236, respectively), TLR, loss of clinical patency, and all-cause death were similar between the DCB and DES groups. In the DCB and DES groups, both primary and secondary outcomes were similar between the IL and SI approaches. DCB and DES strategies for patients presenting with FP total occlusive lesions demonstrated similar outcomes regardless of the IL or SI approach. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02748226.
- Subjects
ARTERIAL diseases; BALLOON occlusion; AMPUTATION; COMPARATIVE studies
- Publication
Scientific Reports, 2024, Vol 14, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
2045-2322
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-71745-0