We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Right to Remain Silent... Sometimes: Why § 1983 Claims for Miranda Violations Are Necessary to Fifth Amendment Protection.
- Authors
Moore, Logan
- Abstract
The article offers legal background on the protection of criminal suspects from involuntary statements in interrogations in the U.S. It mentions that U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restricts prosecutors from using a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial unless they can show that the person was informed of the right to consult with an attorney.
- Subjects
MIRANDA v. Arizona; POLICE questioning; DUE process of law; RIGHT to counsel; UNITED States. Supreme Court
- Publication
Missouri Law Review, 2023, Vol 88, Issue 1, p247
- ISSN
0026-6604
- Publication type
Article