We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
FINDING THE SHOES THAT FIT: HOW DERIVATIVE IS THE TRUSTEE'S POWER TO AVOID FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES UNDER SECTION 544(b) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE?
- Authors
Resnick, Alan N.
- Abstract
Section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, which enables a bankruptcy trustee to avoid transfers that an actual unsecured creditor could have avoided under state law, is a powerful tool most often used to recover assets that were fraudulently transferred several years before a debtor's bankruptcy case. This power is often described as permitting the trustee, for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate and all of the debtor's unsecured creditors, to "stand in the shoes" and assert the rights of the particular unsecured creditor. In a recent case, In re Allou Distributors, Inc., the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York held that a Chapter 7 trustee, acting under § 544(b), could avoid a transfer of assets, if made by an insolvent debtor for less than fair consideration, by relying on the rights of an actual unsecured creditor that held a claim both on the date of the transfer and on the date of the commencement of the bankruptcy case, even if the claim was not the same on both dates and the earlier claim had been paid in full before bankruptcy. This decision raises important questions regarding the derivative nature of § 544(b) and could have far-reaching implications with respect to the scope of a bankruptcy trustee's power to recover fraudulently conveyed assets. The court's reasoning has the potential of expanding the trustee's powers beyond the power of any actual creditor at the time of bankruptcy, thus departing from the derivative nature of § 544(b). At the same time, by not linking the trustee's powers under § 544(b) to the rights of future creditors under applicable state fraudulent conveyance statutes, the decision has the potential of narrowing the trustee's avoidance powers in certain situations. The Allou Distributors decision and its potential application to other cases highlight the importance of understanding the relationship of federal and state law, the derivative nature of § 544(b), and the provisions of applicable state fraudulent conveyance statutes.
- Subjects
NEW York (State); BANKRUPTCY; TRUSTS &; trustees; LEGAL claims; DEBTOR &; creditor; FRAUDULENT conveyances; ASSETS (Accounting); STATE laws; STOCK transfer; ALLOU Distributors Inc.; STOCKHOLDERS' derivative actions; ESTATES (Law)
- Publication
Cardozo Law Review, 2009, Vol 31, Issue 1, p205
- ISSN
0270-5192
- Publication type
Article