We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Might the bioethical principle of individual decisional autonomy have a politically liberalizing effect on soft authoritarian communities?
- Authors
Gregg, Benjamin
- Abstract
According to the bioethical principle of individual decisional autonomy, the patient has a right of informed consent to any medical or experimental procedure. The principle is politically liberal by advocating significant individual freedom as guaranteed by law and secured by civil liberties. When practiced in illiberal communities, might it have a political liberalizing effect? I respond first by analyzing cross-national norms of individual decisional autonomy to identify tensions with illiberal community; second, by examining examining Singapore in a single case study to show that liberal bioethics does not promote political liberalization; and third, by showing that the possibility of practicing liberal bioethics in research, clinically as well as in education, does not require a democratic order, and that liberal bioethics is unlikely to encourage the liberalization of illiberal political communities. Hence, it may never contribute to the development of globally effective cross-national norms for the legal regulation of bioethical research and clinical practice. Fourth, to bolster this analysis, I anticipate several possible objections to various of its aspects.
- Subjects
SINGAPORE; LEGAL norms; CIVIL rights; CIVIL law; INFORMED consent (Medical law); POLITICAL community
- Publication
Politics & the Life Sciences, 2024, Vol 43, Issue 1, p132
- ISSN
0730-9384
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1017/pls.2023.20