We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
State v. Hill.
- Authors
GAVRYSH, NAZARIY
- Abstract
The article presents a court case in which the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled that calling the emergency number 911 to secure identifying information about a suspect did not constitute a Fourth Amendment search. In the case State V. Hill, defendant James Hill argued that the police violated his right against warrantless search when they called 911 to identify his identity in his password-protected phone. Hill left his phone in the back seat of a taxi when he fled without paying his fare.
- Subjects
SEARCHES &; seizures of cell phones; HILL, James; SEARCHES &; seizures (Law); GEORGIA. Court of Appeals; UNITED States. Constitution. 4th Amendment; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
New York Law School Law Review, 2017, Vol 62, Issue 2/3, p325
- ISSN
0145-448X
- Publication type
Article