We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Linguistic manipulations in legal discourse: Framing questions and 'smuggling' information.
- Authors
Aldridge, Michelle; Luchjenbroers, June
- Abstract
With an emphasis on the linguistic experiences of sexual-assault witnesses in the British legal system (adult rape victims and child abuse victims), this paper is a consideration of how the lexical choices in the questions posed to a witness encourage a particular perception of her testimony. The concepts to be discussed include conceptual frames and smuggling information, and we offer a qualitative consideration of how the semantic features of a lawyer's lexical choices can support a representation of either the witness or her experiences that is not in her interests. The appropriateness of a lawyer's chosen frame is of key importance to 'smuggling information', a term used when a lawyer's question inserts (negative) information into a witness's testimony through suggestion. We look at how such linguistic manipulations can weaken a witness's account by suggesting that she is to blame, and/or is lying or perhaps has simply misunderstood the situation. Our analysis offers an explanation as to why vulnerable witnesses may not be believed in court.
- Subjects
UNITED Kingdom; LEGAL language; LANGUAGE &; languages; MANIPULATIVE behavior; TRIALS (Rape); TRIALS (Child sexual abuse); WITNESSES; LAWYERS
- Publication
International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 2007, Vol 14, Issue 1, p85
- ISSN
1748-8885
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.85