We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
ANTITRUST LAW, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND THE "PATENT BULLY": THE "SHAM" EXCEPTION TO NOERR-PENNINGTON PETITIONING IMMUNITY IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION AFTER THE PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE DECISION.
- Authors
FULBRIGHT, PAUL W.
- Abstract
The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Professional Real Estate Investors Inc. (PRE) v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc. which focuses on issues of patent infringement, petitioning immunity, and sham claims in light of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. Topics include rulings the cases Walker Process Equipment v. Food Machinery and Chemical, FilmTec v. Hydranautics, and Q-Pharma v. Andrew Jergens Co.
- Subjects
UNITED States; COLUMBIA Pictures Industries Inc.; PATENT suits; NOERR Motor Freight Inc.; PRIVILEGES &; immunities (Law); WALKER Process Equipment Inc.; FILMTEC Corp.; Q-Pharma Inc.; UNITED States. Supreme Court; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Southern Law Journal, 2019, Vol 29, Issue 1, p103
- ISSN
1056-2184
- Publication type
Article