We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Assessment of right ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography improves accuracy and decreases interobserver variability compared with conventional two-dimensional views.
- Authors
Sarah Chua; Robert A. Levine; Chaim Yosefy; Mark D. Handschumacher; John Chu; Anwer Qureshi; Jennifer Neary; Thanh-Thao Ton-Nu; Morgan Fu; Chiung Jen Wu; Judy Hung
- Abstract
: Aims Two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) assessment of right ventricular (RV) function is difficult, often resulting in inconsistent RV evaluation. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) allows the RV to be viewed in multiple planes, which can potentially improve RV assessment and limit interobserver variability when compared with 2DE. : Methods and results Twenty-five patients underwent 2DE and RT3DE. Views of 2DE (RV inflow, RV short axis, and apical four-chamber) were compared with RT3DE views by four readers. RT3DE data sets were sliced from anterior–posterior (apical view) and from base to apex (short axis) to obtain six standardized planes. Readers recorded the RV ejection fraction (RVEF) from 2DE and RT3DE images. RVEF recorded by RT3DE (RVEF3D) and 2D (RVEF2D) were compared with RVEF by disc summation (RVEFDS), which was used as a reference. Interobserver variability among readers of RVEF3D and RVEF2D was then compared. Overall, mean RVEFDS, RVEF3D, and RVEF2D were 37 ± 11%, 38 ± 10%, 41 ± 10%, respectively. The mean difference of RVEF3D − RVEFDS was significantly less than RVEF2D–RVEFDS (3.7 ± 4% vs. 7.1 ± 5%, P = 0.0066, F-test). RVEF3D correlated better with RVEFDS (r = 0.875 vs. r = 0.69, P = 0.028, t-test). RVEF3D was associated with a 39% decrease in interobserver variability when compared with RVEF2D [standard deviation of mean difference: 3.7 vs. 5.1, (RT3DE vs. 2DE), P = 0.018, t-test]. : Conclusions RT3DE provides improved accuracy of RV function assessment and decreases interobserver variability when compared with 2D views.
- Subjects
RIGHT heart ventricle; HEART function tests; TWO-dimensional echocardiography; CARDIAC imaging; HEART physiology; MEDICAL imaging systems
- Publication
European Journal of Echocardiography, 2009, Vol 10, Issue 5, p619
- ISSN
1525-2167
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/ejechocard/jep013