We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Judicial Interpretation of Tort Law in Milieudefensie v. Shell : A Rejoinder.
- Authors
Mayer, Benoit
- Abstract
In her response to my case comment in this issue of Transnational Environmental Law, Laura Burgers purports to disagree with my analysis on two points. Firstly, she suggests that we disagree on the method that a court should use to interpret the duty of care of corporations on climate change mitigation. Secondly, she disagrees with each of the four inconsistencies that I identify in the decision by the District Court of The Hague (the Netherlands) in Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell. In this rejoinder, I respectfully disagree with her characterization of our disagreement.
- Subjects
HAGUE (Netherlands); NETHERLANDS; TORTS; CLIMATE change mitigation; SHELL Oil Co.; REASONABLE care (Law); LEGAL judgments; SHELL UK Ltd.; ENVIRONMENTAL law
- Publication
Transnational Environmental Law, 2022, Vol 11, Issue 2, p433
- ISSN
2047-1025
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1017/S2047102522000279