We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Improving Patient Handovers From Hospital to Primary Care.
- Authors
Hesselink, Gijs; Schoonhoven, Lisette; Barach, Paul; Spijker, Anouk; Gademan, Petra; Kalkman, Cor; Liefers, Janine; Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra; Wollersheim, Hub
- Abstract
Background: Evidence shows that suboptimum handovers at hos-pital discharge lead to increased hospitalizations and decreased quality of health care. Purpose: To systematically review interventions that aim to im-prove patient discharge from hospital to primary care. Data Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, Psyclnfo, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1990 and March 2011. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials of interventions that aimed to improve handovers between hospital and primary care providers at hospital discharge. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently abstracted data on study objectives, setting and design, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Studies were categorized according to methodolog-ical quality, sample size, intervention characteristics, outcome, statistical significance, and direction of effects. Data Synthesis: Of the 36 included studies, 25 (69.4%) had statistically significant effects in favor of the intervention group and 34 (94.4%) described multicomponent interventions. Effective inter-ventions included medication reconciliation; electronic tools to fa cilitate quick, clear, and structured summary generation; discharge planning; shared involvement in follow-up by hospital and commu-nity care providers; use of electronic discharge notifications; and Web-based access to discharge information for general practitio-ners. Statistically significant effects were mostly found in reducing hospital use (for example, hospitalizations), improvement of con-tinuity of care (for example, accurate discharge information), and improvement of patient status after discharge (for example, satisfaction). Limitations: Heterogeneity of the interventions and study charac-teristics made meta-analysis impossible. Most studies had diffuse aims and poor descriptions of the specific intervention components. Conclusion: Many interventions have positive effects on patient care. However, given the complexity of interventions and outcome measures, the literature does not permit firm conclusions about which interventions have these effects. Primary Funding Source: The European Union, the Framework Programme of the European Commission.
- Subjects
EVALUATION of medical care; PUBMED (Online service); CINAHL database; HOSPITAL care; EUROPEAN Union; SERVICES for hospital patients
- Publication
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2012, Vol 157, Issue 6, p417
- ISSN
0003-4819
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00006