We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Rescuing Mele/Robb-Style Cases.
- Authors
Rychter, Pablo
- Abstract
A good part of the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility in the last fifty years has revolved around so-called Frankfurt-style cases. One of the most important milestones in this debate is the case described by Mele and Robb (1998), which was intended to avoid some earlier objections directed at Frankfurt's original argument. However, the success of Mele and Robb's case has been contested by Pereboom (2001), Widerker (2003), and Moya (2003, 2017), among others. The present paper aims to vindicate Mele and Robb's (and Frankfurt's) general argument by describing a variation of their case that overcomes or avoids the objections of those authors.
- Subjects
FRANKFURT am Main (Germany); AUTONOMY (Psychology); RESPONSIBILITY; AUTONOMY (Philosophy); FREE will &; determinism; OBJECTIONS (Evidence); ARGUMENT
- Publication
Acta Analytica, 2023, Vol 38, Issue 4, p689
- ISSN
0353-5150
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s12136-023-00547-2