We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Effects of restricted feed intake on heat energy by different goat breeds.
- Authors
Helal, A.; Puchala, R.; Detweiler, G. D.; Gipson, T. A.; Sahlu, T.; Goetsch, A. L.
- Abstract
Sixteen Boer goat doelings, 16 Spanish doelings, and 8 Angora doelings and 8 wethers, 283, 316, and 330 d of age initially (SEM = 5.0), respectively, were used to evaluate effects of nutrient restriction on heat energy (HE). During the first and second 10-wk phases, 8 animals of each breed were fed a 50% concentrate pelletized diet at a level adequate for maintenance and moderate energy accretion (CONT). Other animals were fed approximately 50% of these amounts in phase 1 relative to initial BW, followed by the greater level of feeding in phase 2 based on initial or actual BW when greater (REST). Average daily gain was 43, −20, 16, −78, 8, and −48 g in phase 1 (SEM = 5.0) and 26, 44, 50, 65, 27, and 32 g in phase 2 (SEM = 3.5) for Angora-CONT, Angora-REST, Boer-CONT, Boer-REST, Spanish-CONT, and Spanish-REST, respectively. Total HE was greater for CONT vs. REST in both phases (P < 0.001), greater in phase 1 for Angora than for Boer (P < 0.01) and Spanish (P < 0.01), and greatest (P < 0.01) in phase 2 among breeds for Angora [481, 347, 430, 356, 424, and 338 kJ/kg of BW0.75 per day in phase 1 (SEM = 11.1), and 494, 479, 445, 397, 444, and 406 kJ/kg of BW0.75 per day in phase 2 (SEM = 11.3) for Angora-CONT, Angora-REST, Boer-CONT, Boer-REST, Spanish-CONT, and Spanish-REST, respectively]. Equations describing the temporal pattern of HE (kJ/kg of BW0.75 per day), expressed as a percentage of the wk-0 value and corrected for corresponding breed × week CONT means, in phase 1 were 95.8 ± 2.43 - (8.18 ± 1.144 × week) + (0.655 ± 0.1098 × week2) for Angora (R2 = 0.58), 95.3 ± 2.63 - (4.34 ± 1.237 × wk) + (0.271 ± 0.1187 × wk2) for Boer (R2 = 0.41), and 97.4 ± 2.21 − (4.69 ± 1.068 × wk) + (0.282 ± 0.1021 × wk2) for Spanish (R2 = 0.53). Phase 2 equations were 78.9 ± 2.22 + (8.74 ± 1.036 × wk) − (0.608 ± 0.0095 × wk2) for Angora (R2 = 0.60), 77.5 ± 2.10 + (3.30 ± 0.978 × wk) − (0.153 ± 0.0942 × wk2) for Boer (R2 = 0.39), and 80.6 ± 2.50 + (4.50 ± 1.165 × wk) − (0.208 ± 0.1122 × wk2) for Spanish (R2 = 0.43). These equations indicate that changes in HE in response to nutrient restriction and realimentation were more rapid and of greater magnitude in Angora vs. Boer and Spanish. The temporal pattern of decline in HE by Boer and Spanish during restriction was similar, but the subsequent rise with realimentation was slower and smaller for Boer. In conclusion, most appropriate methods of predicting change in the maintenance energy requirement during and after periods of limited feed intake may differ among breeds of goats.
- Subjects
INGESTION; GOAT feeding &; feeds; ANIMAL heat; ANGORA goat; TISSUE metabolism; FIBERS
- Publication
Journal of Animal Science, 2011, Vol 89, Issue 12, p4175
- ISSN
0021-8812
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.2527/jas.2011-3907