We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
GENERAL PARTNER'S REQUEST FOR A STAY OF ARBITRATION ON THE BASIS OF THE ALLEGED FAILURE OF LIMITED PARTNERS TO NOTIFY OTHER PARTNERS OF THE ARBITRATION WAS DENIED BECAUSE THAT OBJECTION SHOULD BE ADDRESSED INITIALLY TO THE ARBITRATOR.
- Abstract
This article focuses on the court ruling given in Rabinor v. Pashman case. General partner's request for a stay of arbitration on the basis of the alleged failure of limited partners to notify other partners of the arbitration was denied because that objection should be addressed initially to the arbitrator. The court said: "Neither the jury nor the petitioners have any reason to believe that the arbitrator will overlook the possible effect of the proceeding on the interests of absent limited partners, or the possible effect of their absence on petitioners' interests, or that merely out of caprice the arbitrator will decline to direct that absent partners be notified of the proceeding and afforded opportunity to be heard."
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); ARBITRATION &; award; GENERAL partnership; ARBITRATORS; COMMERCIAL law
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1965, Vol 20, Issue 2, p126
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article