We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Authors
Marrouche, Nassir F.; Wazni, Oussama; McGann, Christopher; Greene, Tom; Dean, J. Michael; Dagher, Lilas; Kholmovski, Eugene; Mansour, Moussa; Marchlinski, Francis; Wilber, David; Hindricks, Gerhard; Mahnkopf, Christian; Wells, Darryl; Jais, Pierre; Sanders, Prashanthan; Brachmann, Johannes; Bax, Jeroen J.; Morrison-de Boer, Leonie; Deneke, Thomas; Calkins, Hugh
- Abstract
<bold>Importance: </bold>Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. Left atrial fibrosis plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AF and has been associated with poor procedural outcomes.<bold>Objective: </bold>To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of targeting atrial fibrosis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in persistent AF.<bold>Design, Setting, and Participants: </bold>The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 44 academic and nonacademic centers in 10 countries. A total of 843 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic persistent AF and undergoing AF ablation were enrolled from July 2016 to January 2020, with follow-up through February 19, 2021.<bold>Interventions: </bold>Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus MRI-guided atrial fibrosis ablation (421 patients) or PVI alone (422 patients). Delayed-enhancement MRI was performed in both groups before the ablation procedure to assess baseline atrial fibrosis and at 3 months postablation to assess for ablation scar.<bold>Main Outcomes and Measures: </bold>The primary end point was time to first atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period postablation. The primary safety composite outcome was defined by the occurrence of 1 or more of the following events within 30 days postablation: stroke, PV stenosis, bleeding, heart failure, or death.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 843 patients who were randomized (mean age 62.7 years; 178 [21.1%] women), 815 (96.9%) completed the 90-day blanking period and contributed to the efficacy analyses. There was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence between groups (fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI patients, 175 [43.0%] vs PVI-only patients, 188 [46.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .63). Patients in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group experienced a higher rate of safety outcomes (9 [2.2%] vs 0 in PVI group; P = .001). Six patients (1.5%) in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group had an ischemic stroke compared with none in PVI-only group. Two deaths occurred in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group, and the first one was possibly related to the procedure.<bold>Conclusions and Relevance: </bold>Among patients with persistent AF, MRI-guided fibrosis ablation plus PVI, compared with PVI catheter ablation only, resulted in no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Findings do not support the use of MRI-guided fibrosis ablation for the treatment of persistent AF.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529319.
- Subjects
RESEARCH; RESEARCH methodology; ATRIAL fibrillation; CATHETER ablation; MAGNETIC resonance imaging; FIBROSIS; EVALUATION research; DISEASE relapse; TREATMENT effectiveness; COMPARATIVE studies; RANDOMIZED controlled trials; DISEASE complications
- Publication
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2022, Vol 327, Issue 23, p2296
- ISSN
0098-7484
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1001/jama.2022.8831