We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
When One Word Changes Everything: How the Unitary Concept Dismantles the Basis of Terry Frisks.
- Authors
DAVISON, AARON D.
- Abstract
The article argues that the Fourth Circuit misinterpreted the U.S. Supreme Court's use of armed and thus dangerous standard in United States v. Robinson. Topics covered include the history of the inception of stop-and-frisk and explains the procedural history, facts, and reasoning behind the case, how the implications of the unitary concept will affect lawful gun carriers and those assumed to be armed and the need for the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in a stop-and-frisk case.
- Subjects
UNITED States; INTERPRETATION &; construction of criminal law; UNITED States. Court of Appeals (4th Circuit); GUN laws; WEAPON laws; GUN control in the United States; CERTIORARI
- Publication
North Carolina Law Review, 2018, Vol 97, Issue 1, p192
- ISSN
0029-2524
- Publication type
Article