We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Reply.
- Authors
de Vet, C. M.; van Oostrum, N. H. M.; Clur, S. B.; Oei, S. G.; van Laar, J. O. E. H.
- Abstract
Although Erickson I et al i .[6] and Li I et al i .[7] also used the TOMTEC software, they used a different ultrasound device (Vivid E9 ultrasound system; GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway) compared with the one used in our study (Epiq W7 ultrasound system; Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands)[3]. DeVore I et al i .[10] and Wang I et al i .[13] used a Voluson E10 ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) and TOMTEC software, Germanakis I et al i .[14] used an Acuson Sequoia ultrasound system and Syngo Velocity Vector Imaging software (Siemens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA, USA) and we used an Epiq W7 ultrasound system and TOMTEC software[3]. We read with interest the comment by DeVore about our previous Reply[1] to his Correspondence[2] regarding our Original Paper[3].
- Subjects
SPECKLE tracking echocardiography; GLOBAL longitudinal strain; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FETAL echocardiography; SMALL for gestational age; FETAL growth retardation
- Publication
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2023, Vol 62, Issue 3, p448
- ISSN
0960-7692
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1002/uog.26317